Evaluation of a clutch-containment method during hatch in geese: Using resident Canada geese as an example

This article was originally published in Wildlife Society Bulletin. The version of record is available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.127. Copyright © The Wildlife Society, 2012 Disruption associated with nest visits during the hatch period of waterfowl can cause partial abandonment of hatchlings,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Main Authors: Guerena, Katherine B., Castelli, Paul M., Nichols, Theodore C., Williams, Christopher K.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wildlife Society Bulletin 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/33674
Description
Summary:This article was originally published in Wildlife Society Bulletin. The version of record is available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.127. Copyright © The Wildlife Society, 2012 Disruption associated with nest visits during the hatch period of waterfowl can cause partial abandonment of hatchlings, potentially causing bias in the survival of marked birds. We evaluated the use of a mesh clutch-containment bag to capture and mark entire broods of 151 resident Canada goose (Branta canadensis) nests, prior to hatch, while minimizing observer-caused disruption during brooding. The study was conducted in New Jersey, USA, from April to June 2010. No differences were found in hatch success or the number of hatchlings marked between contained clutches and the control group. Although this technique was not beneficial in studying gosling survival in temperate nesting populations, it may be effective in sub-Arctic nesting conditions where nest visits are conducted using a more invasive approach such as a helicopter. © 2012 The Wildlife Society. This work was supported by the University of Delaware and New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife, Pittman–Robertson Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration Grant W-68-R. We would also like to thank T. Watts, A. Dinges, J. Garris, K. Tinnes, and K. Duren for their hard work collecting field data.