Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models

Uncertainty in the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is analyzed in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) and Phase 5 (CMIP5) projections for the twenty-first century; and the different sources of uncertainty (scenario, internal and model) are qua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climate Dynamics
Main Authors: Reintges, Annika, Martin, Thomas, Latif, Mojib, Keenlyside, Noel
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1956/16295
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3180-x
_version_ 1821653256122662912
author Reintges, Annika
Martin, Thomas
Latif, Mojib
Keenlyside, Noel
author_facet Reintges, Annika
Martin, Thomas
Latif, Mojib
Keenlyside, Noel
author_sort Reintges, Annika
collection University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB)
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 1495
container_title Climate Dynamics
container_volume 49
description Uncertainty in the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is analyzed in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) and Phase 5 (CMIP5) projections for the twenty-first century; and the different sources of uncertainty (scenario, internal and model) are quantified. Although the uncertainty in future projections of the AMOC index at 30°N is larger in CMIP5 than in CMIP3, the signal-to-noise ratio is comparable during the second half of the century and even larger in CMIP5 during the first half. This is due to a stronger AMOC reduction in CMIP5. At lead times longer than a few decades, model uncertainty dominates uncertainty in future projections of AMOC strength in both the CMIP3 and CMIP5 model ensembles. Internal variability significantly contributes only during the first few decades, while scenario uncertainty is relatively small at all lead times. Model uncertainty in future changes in AMOC strength arises mostly from uncertainty in density, as uncertainty arising from wind stress (Ekman transport) is negligible. Finally, the uncertainty in changes in the density originates mostly from the simulation of salinity, rather than temperature. High-latitude freshwater flux and the subpolar gyre projections were also analyzed, because these quantities are thought to play an important role for the future AMOC changes. The freshwater input in high latitudes is projected to increase and the subpolar gyre is projected to weaken. Both the freshening and the gyre weakening likely influence the AMOC by causing anomalous salinity advection into the regions of deep water formation. While the high model uncertainty in both parameters may explain the uncertainty in the AMOC projection, deeper insight into the mechanisms for AMOC is required to reach a more quantitative conclusion. acceptedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
id ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:1956/16295
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivbergen
op_container_end_page 1511
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3180-x
op_relation Norges forskningsråd: 229774
Notur/NorStore: NN9039K
Notur/NorStore: NS9039K
EU: 603521
Notur/NorStore: NN9385K
Notur/NorStore: NS9207K
EU: 648982
urn:issn:1432-0894
https://hdl.handle.net/1956/16295
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3180-x
cristin:1364350
op_rights Copyright 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
op_source Climate Dynamics
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivbergen:oai:bora.uib.no:1956/16295 2025-01-16T23:44:37+00:00 Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models Reintges, Annika Martin, Thomas Latif, Mojib Keenlyside, Noel 2016-12-27T08:45:54Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/1956/16295 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3180-x eng eng Springer Norges forskningsråd: 229774 Notur/NorStore: NN9039K Notur/NorStore: NS9039K EU: 603521 Notur/NorStore: NN9385K Notur/NorStore: NS9207K EU: 648982 urn:issn:1432-0894 https://hdl.handle.net/1956/16295 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3180-x cristin:1364350 Copyright 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Climate Dynamics Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) North Atlantic Ocean Climate change uncertainty Climate projections Peer reviewed Journal article 2016 ftunivbergen https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3180-x 2023-03-14T17:43:12Z Uncertainty in the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is analyzed in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) and Phase 5 (CMIP5) projections for the twenty-first century; and the different sources of uncertainty (scenario, internal and model) are quantified. Although the uncertainty in future projections of the AMOC index at 30°N is larger in CMIP5 than in CMIP3, the signal-to-noise ratio is comparable during the second half of the century and even larger in CMIP5 during the first half. This is due to a stronger AMOC reduction in CMIP5. At lead times longer than a few decades, model uncertainty dominates uncertainty in future projections of AMOC strength in both the CMIP3 and CMIP5 model ensembles. Internal variability significantly contributes only during the first few decades, while scenario uncertainty is relatively small at all lead times. Model uncertainty in future changes in AMOC strength arises mostly from uncertainty in density, as uncertainty arising from wind stress (Ekman transport) is negligible. Finally, the uncertainty in changes in the density originates mostly from the simulation of salinity, rather than temperature. High-latitude freshwater flux and the subpolar gyre projections were also analyzed, because these quantities are thought to play an important role for the future AMOC changes. The freshwater input in high latitudes is projected to increase and the subpolar gyre is projected to weaken. Both the freshening and the gyre weakening likely influence the AMOC by causing anomalous salinity advection into the regions of deep water formation. While the high model uncertainty in both parameters may explain the uncertainty in the AMOC projection, deeper insight into the mechanisms for AMOC is required to reach a more quantitative conclusion. acceptedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic University of Bergen: Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA-UiB) Climate Dynamics 49 5-6 1495 1511
spellingShingle Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)
North Atlantic Ocean
Climate change uncertainty
Climate projections
Reintges, Annika
Martin, Thomas
Latif, Mojib
Keenlyside, Noel
Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models
title Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models
title_full Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models
title_fullStr Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models
title_short Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models
title_sort uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the atlantic meridional overturning circulation in cmip3 and cmip5 models
topic Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)
North Atlantic Ocean
Climate change uncertainty
Climate projections
topic_facet Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)
North Atlantic Ocean
Climate change uncertainty
Climate projections
url https://hdl.handle.net/1956/16295
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3180-x