Does waste feed from salmon farming affect the quality of saithe (Pollachius virens L.) attracted to fish farms?
Salmon farms attract large amounts of wild fish, which prey on uneaten feed pellets. The modified diet of the wild fish aggregating at salmon farms may reduce the flesh quality of the fish, influencing the local fisheries. We compared the quality of saithe (Pollachius virens) captured near (farm ass...
Published in: | Aquaculture Research |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
John Wiley & Sons
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/103852 https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14519 |
Summary: | Salmon farms attract large amounts of wild fish, which prey on uneaten feed pellets. The modified diet of the wild fish aggregating at salmon farms may reduce the flesh quality of the fish, influencing the local fisheries. We compared the quality of saithe (Pollachius virens) captured near (farm associated—FA) or more than 5 km away (un‐associated—UA) from salmon farms in Norway. The fish were captured during summer, autumn and spring using two commercial fishing methods (jigging and bottom nets). Overall, the fillet quality of FA saithe was good, although it was clearly reduced for almost 10% of the catch. Moreover, the quality of the FA saithe was significantly reduced compared with UA saithe, but the differences were small. Our results also showed that fish caught with jigging had better quality than fish caught with nets, and that fish that died in the nets were of lower quality than fish that were alive after hauling. There was no clear variation among seasons in fillet quality. Although no major and overall differences in quality were found between FA and UA saithe, reduced quality for even a modest proportion of the fish may influence the value of the total catch. The study was funded by the Norwegian Seafood Research Fund through the ProCoEx project (Project number: 900772) and the Norwegian Research Council through the project ‘ECOCOAST’. Kilian Toledo‐Guedes was supported by a grant from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway through the EEA Financial Mechanism (ES07‐EEA Grants, 013‐ABEL‐IM‐2013), operated by Universidad Complutense de Madrid, and Juan de la Cierva Program FJCI‐2014‐20100 and IJCI‐2017‐34174 from Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades. |
---|