Seismic array processing and computational infrastructure for improved monitoring of Alaskan and Aleutian seismicity and volcanoes

Dissertation (Ph.D.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 1998 We constructed a near-real-time system, called Iceworm, to automate seismic data collection, processing, storage, and distribution at the Alaska Earthquake Information Center (AEIC). Phase-picking, phase association, and interprocess communic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lindquist, Kent Gordon
Other Authors: Hansen, Roger, Wyss, Max, Christensen, Douglas, McNutt, Stephen
Format: Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
Language:unknown
Published: 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11122/9488
Description
Summary:Dissertation (Ph.D.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 1998 We constructed a near-real-time system, called Iceworm, to automate seismic data collection, processing, storage, and distribution at the Alaska Earthquake Information Center (AEIC). Phase-picking, phase association, and interprocess communication components come from Earthworm (U.S. Geological Survey). A new generic, internal format for digital data supports unified handling of data from diverse sources. A new infrastructure for applying processing algorithms to near-real-time data streams supports automated information extraction from seismic wavefields. Integration of Datascope (U. of Colorado) provides relational database management of all automated measurements, parametric information for located hypocenters, and waveform data from Iceworm. Data from 1997 yield 329 earthquakes located by both Iceworm and the AEIC. Of these, 203 have location residuals under 22 km, sufficient for hazard response. Regionalized inversions for local magnitude in Alaska yield $\rm M\sb{L}$ calibration curves $\rm (logA\sb0)$ that differ from the Californian Richter magnitude. The new curve is $\rm 0.2\ M\sb{L}$ units more attenuative than the Californian curve at 400 km for earthquakes north of the Denali fault. South of the fault, and for a region north of Cook Inlet, the difference is $\rm 0.4\ M\sb{L}.$ A curve for deep events differs by $\rm 0.6\ M\sb{L}$ at 650 km. We expand geographic coverage of Alaskan regional seismic monitoring to the Aleutians, the Bering Sea, and the entire Arctic by initiating the processing of four short-period, Alaskan seismic arrays. To show the array stations' sensitivity, we detect and locate two microearthquakes that were missed by the AEIC. An empirical study of the location sensitivity of the arrays predicts improvements over the Alaskan regional network that are shown as map-view contour plots. We verify these predictions by detecting an $\rm M\sb{L}$ 3.2 event near Unimak Island with one array. The detection and location of four ...