Ghost Factors of Laboratory Carbonate Chemistry Are Haunting Our Experiments

For many historical and contemporary experimental studies in marine biology, seawater carbonate chemistry remains a ghost factor, an uncontrolled, unmeasured, and often dynamic variable affecting experimental organisms or the treatments to which investigators subject them. We highlight how environme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Biological Bulletin
Main Authors: Galloway, Aaron W. E., Dassow, G. Von, Schram, Julie B., Klinger, T., Hill, T. M., Lowe, A. T., Chan, F., Yoshioka, R. M., Kroeker, K. J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The University of Chicago 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11122/12867
Description
Summary:For many historical and contemporary experimental studies in marine biology, seawater carbonate chemistry remains a ghost factor, an uncontrolled, unmeasured, and often dynamic variable affecting experimental organisms or the treatments to which investigators subject them. We highlight how environmental variability, such as seasonal upwelling and biological respiration, drive variation in seawater carbonate chemistry that can influence laboratory experiments in unintended ways and introduce a signal consistent with ocean acidification. As the impacts of carbonate chemistry on biochemical pathways that underlie growth, development, reproduction, and behavior become better understood, the hidden effects of this previously overlooked variable need to be acknowledged. Here we bring this emerging challenge to the attention of the wider community of experimental biologists who rely on access to organisms and water from marine and estuarine laboratories and who may benefit from explicit considerations of a growing literature on the pervasive effects of aquatic carbonate chemistry changes. AWEG and JBS were supported by Oregon Sea Grant (OSG; R/ECO-37-Galloway1820) from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Sea Grant College Program, from the U.S. Department of Commerce, and by appropriations made by the Oregon State Legislature. GvD was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF; MCB-1614606) and National Institutes of Health (GM052932). RMY was supported by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (1309047). FC was supported by OSG (R/ ECO-32-Chan). KJK was supported by the David and Lucille Packard Foundation and the NSF (OCE-1752600). The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of these funders. We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive comments from two anonymous peer reviewers Yes