Rapid restoration of belowground structure and fauna of a seagrass habitat

Seagrass meadows are habitat for an abundance and diversity of animal life, and their continuing global loss has focused effort on their restoration. This restoration not only aims to re‐establish the structure of the seagrass, but also to restore its function, particularly as habitat. The success o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Restoration Ecology
Main Authors: Tanner, J.E., McSkimming, C., Russell, B.D., Connell, S.D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley Online Library 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2440/129781
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13289
Description
Summary:Seagrass meadows are habitat for an abundance and diversity of animal life, and their continuing global loss has focused effort on their restoration. This restoration not only aims to re‐establish the structure of the seagrass, but also to restore its function, particularly as habitat. The success of seagrass restoration is typically measured by the recovery of aboveground structure, but this ignores the important role of the belowground component of seagrass ecosystems, which may not recover at the same rate, and is equally important for faunal communities. We quantify infaunal communities (abundance, richness, and composition) within expanding plots of restored seagrass, and relate their change to the recovery of belowground seagrass biomass and sediment properties. We found that infaunal abundance and composition converged on that found in natural seagrass within 2 years, while the overall infaunal richness was not affected by habitat. The carbon content of surface sediments also recovered within 2 years, although recovery of belowground biomass and sediment grain size took 4 to 6 years. These results suggest that the structure of recovering seagrass habitats may not need to attain that of natural meadows before they support infauna that is comparable to natural communities. This pace and effectiveness of recovery provides some optimism for future seagrass restoration. Jason E. Tanner, Chloe McSkimming, Bayden D. Russell, Sean D. Connell