Habitat related variation in UV tolerance of tropical marine red macrophytes is not temperature dependent

• Main Authors: van de Poll, W.H., Bischof, K., Buma, A.G.J., Breeman, Arno
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2003
• Subjects: ULTRAVIOLET-B RADIATION; INDUCED DNA-DAMAGE; CHONDRUS-CRISPUS FLORIDEOPHYCEAE; OXIDATIVE STRESS; AMINO-ACIDS; ELEVATIONAL GRADIENT; GROWTH IRRADIANCES; DEPTH DISTRIBUTION; ARCTIC MACROALGAE; SOLAR-RADIATION; Arctic
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/11370/d778e783-25b6-4fa8-949c-99fc86304726; https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/habitat-related-variation-in-uv-tolerance-of-tropical-marine-red-macrophytes-is-not-temperature-dependent(d778e783-25b6-4fa8-949c-99fc86304726).html

Because tropical marine macrophytes experience high ultraviolet-B radiation (UVBR: 280-320 nm) it is assumed that they have high UV tolerance. This was investigated by examining the relative UV sensitivity of five Caribbean red macrophytes. Furthermore, the possibility of temperature dependence of UV effects was examined over a tropical temperature range. Algal fragments of intertidally occurring Gelidiopsis planicaulis (Taylor) Taylor, Wurdemannia miniata (Duby) Feldman and Hamel, and Hypnea spinella (Agardh) Kutzing, and the subtidal species Bryothamnion triquetrum (Gmelin) Howe and Heterosiphonia gibbesii (Harvey) Falkenberg were repeatedly subjected to artificial UVBR and ultraviolet-A radiation (UVAR: 320-400 nm) at 22, 26 and 30degreesC, whereas exposure to photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) served as control. Growth rates, optimal quantum yield of PSII and accumulation of DNA damage were monitored for 10 days, whereas the relative abundance of the D1 reaction centre binding protein and the presence of UV absorbing compounds were investigated in some samples. UVAR and UVBR significantly depressed growth rates of all species. UVBR exposure caused accumulation of DNA damage and resulted in stronger growth reduction than UVAR. UVBR and UVAR caused a depression of optimal quantum yield and a lower D1 abundance. However, the former recovered fast and acclimated to the UV treatments. Some species produced UV absorbing compounds in response to UVAR. UV exposure caused less pronounced effects in intertidally occurring species than in subtidal species. UV effects on growth, the accumulation of DNA damage and UV induced depression of optimal quantum yield were independent of temperature in most species. We conclude that high UVBR in tropical regions may depress in situ growth rates of these intertidal and subtidal red macrophytes.