Greenland meltwater storage in firn limited by near-surface ice formation

Approximately half of Greenland's current annual mass loss is attributed to runoff from surface melt(1). At higher elevations, however, melt does not necessarily equal runoff, because meltwater can refreeze in the porous near-surface snow and firn2. Two recent studies suggest that all(3) or mos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature Climate Change
Main Authors: Machguth, Horst, MacFerrin, Mike, van As, Dirk, Box, Jason E., Charalampidis, Charalampos, Colgan, William, Fausto, Robert S., Meijer, Harro A. J., Mosley-Thompson, Ellen, van de Wal, Roderik S. W.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
BALANCE OBSERVATIONS
WEST GREENLAND
SHEET
ACCUMULATION
DRAINAGE
NUNAVUT
CANADA
MODEL
CAP
Canada
Greenland
Nunavut
Ice Sheet
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11370/8a3aca2a-06a1-479d-80b2-43625fe736c1
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/8a3aca2a-06a1-479d-80b2-43625fe736c1
https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2899
https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/78982964/Greenland_meltwater_storage_in_firn_limited_by_near_surface_ice_formation.pdf
Description
Summary:Approximately half of Greenland's current annual mass loss is attributed to runoff from surface melt(1). At higher elevations, however, melt does not necessarily equal runoff, because meltwater can refreeze in the porous near-surface snow and firn2. Two recent studies suggest that all(3) or most(3,4) of Greenland's firn pore space is available for meltwater storage, making the firn an important buffer against contribution to sea level rise for decades to come(3). Here, we employ in situ observations and historical legacy data to demonstrate that surface runoff begins to dominate over meltwater storage well before firn pore space has been completely filled. Our observations frame the recent exceptional melt summers in 2010 and 2012 (refs 5,6), revealing significant changes in firn structure at different elevations caused by successive intensive melt events. In the upper regions (more than similar to 1,900m above sea level), firn has undergone substantial densification, while at lower elevations, where melt is most abundant, porous firn has lost most of its capability to retain meltwater. Here, the formation of near-surface ice layers renders deep pore space difficult to access, forcing meltwater to enter an efficient(7) surface discharge system and intensifying ice sheet mass loss earlier than previously suggested(3).

Similar Items