Is Svalbard a pristine ecosystem? Reconstructing 420 years of human presence in an Arctic archipelago

The Arctic is commonly perceived as a pristine wilderness, yet more than four centuries of human industry have not left Svalbard untouched. This paper explores the historical dimension of human-induced ecosystem change using human presence as a proxy. Its aims are fourfold: to reconstruct and quanti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kruse, Frigga
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11370/054b5887-8b7b-40aa-9e95-de9fc6895407
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/054b5887-8b7b-40aa-9e95-de9fc6895407
https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/37688352/div_class_title_is_svalbard_a_pristine_ecosystem_reconstructing_420_years_of_human_presence_in_an_arctic_archipelago_div.pdf
Description
Summary:The Arctic is commonly perceived as a pristine wilderness, yet more than four centuries of human industry have not left Svalbard untouched. This paper explores the historical dimension of human-induced ecosystem change using human presence as a proxy. Its aims are fourfold: to reconstruct and quantify historical human presence, to ascertain if human presence is a suitable indicator of long-term anthropogenic pressure, to deduce trends in anthropogenic pressure on five selected species of game animal, and to postulate trends in their subpopulation sizes. Published sources give rise to 57 datasets dealing with the annual voyages to Svalbard as well as the participants in them. All known archaeological sites are visualised in a distribution map. Despite the large amount of data, the quantification of historical human presence remains biased and partial. Only with the aid of a timeline of known milestones is it possible to hypothesize about changes in anthropogenic pressure and animal subpopulations over time. The exercise is nonetheless a necessary and instructive one: it confirms that the erroneous view of Svalbard as a pristine ecosystem hinders timely historical-ecological research. Future work must aim at the systematic quantification of past human impact in an holistic approach to environmental conservation and restoration.