VIDEO: Session 5: Wrap-Up: Themes, Cross-Cutting Issues, and Transferable Lessons

• Main Authors: Fleck, John, Jacobs, Kathy, Leonard, Kelsey, Tharme, Rebecca, McLeod, Tony
• Format: Text
• Language: unknown
• Published: Colorado Law Scholarly Commons 2016
• Subjects: Rio Grande; Colorado River Basin; water governance; human network boundaries; scarcity issues; shared understanding; social capital; litigation between Texas and New Mexico; integration of groundwater and surface water management; aquifers; surface water flows; functioning institutions; monitoring; evaluation of success; Arizona; potential for policy interventions; cross-scale tension; local scale; state scale; federal scale; Indigenous peoples as nations; equitable role in decision making process; justice concerns; seat at the table; water resource management arenas; First Nation consultation policy; federal agency requirement; Canada; Australia; university level; diplomatic policy; principles of UNDRIP; United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; informed consent; water scarcity; social aspects; water back into rivers; environmental flow conversation; science level; implementation level; collaboration with Indigenous peoples; river basin projects; values and needs; social-science integration; effective use of knowledge and experience; problem definition; solutions from conversations; social framework; voice at the table; Murray-Darling Basin Cap; gold standard; basin plan; embracing of markets; Murray-Darling Basin case; evolution of interesting tools and approaches; river basin management; flow needs; prioritization of flows; environmental sustainability; water delivery; benchmarking performance; essential elements of an ideal process; water rights system; expand and contract; water supply availability; government funding; solutions; Central Arizona Project; CAP; Colorado River management system; protection of existing right holders; habitat restoration; species; water for domestic uses; basin transferability; grants; entitlements; reserved rights; doctrine of discovery; Aboriginal water rights; government role; context; toolbox; cultural flows; federal system; states; design of institutional arrangements; planning process; geographical scale of process; ideal management system; ethical framework; trust; relationships; foundation of good governance; pluralistic society; empowerment of people; insider conversations; universal problem; nature of the word shortage; sophisticated adaptive capacity; municipal water use declining; rising agricultural productivity; scarcity crises; have less water; use less water; new sets of values and needs; information; thriving agricultural economies; sharing arrangements; cultural industry; water supply; water access; water users; informal networks; issue resolution; proper alignment with issues; prior appropriation systems; shifts toward flexibility; traditional knowledge; applied science over thousands of years; tribal water quality codes; Clean Water Act; tribal sovereign rights; spiritual context; EPA’s framework; position of fear; Indigenous people as strongest allies in basin management; infrastructure projects; spiritual values; proactive problem solving; bringing people together; receptivity; openness; global community; third stakeholder; New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council; 64 land councils; freehold title; largest Indigenous water holder; trading; leasing water assets; temporary water market; legislation; National Native Title Act; New South Wales; 1993 Aboriginal Land Rights Act; James Anaya; Basin Plan submissions; NBAN; message in the water; greedy irrigators; 40; 000 years of science; collaborative partnerships and networks; unified vision; framing the problem; compromises; power struggle avoidance; system of checks and balances; feedback loop; procedural due process; same mistakes; respect; pathway to success; network expansion toward inclusion; relationship between First Nations and federal government in Canada; US changing administrations; best management practices; standard of good performance; water management; irrigation districts; basin knowledge; cost of past mistakes; protective view of natural environment; environmental water management; conversations between Australia and South Africa; replicable knowledge; calculation of environmental water needs; methodological tools; data poor; information poor; water insecurity; private sector; market approach; robust institutional and management system; broad societal interests; Colorado River governance; role of Indigenous communities; adequate voice; Native American constitutions; United States Constitution; Third Sovereign; sovereign First Nations; 80; 000 Navajos; water hauling; share the burden; water ethics; inherent violent impacts; Seneca Nation; Kinzua Dam; Pennsylvania; neotropics; research; studies; language; decolonization; African Studies; Aquaculture and Fisheries; Asian Studies; Climate; Comparative and Foreign Law; Environmental Health and Protection; Environmental Policy; Hydrology; Indigenous; Indian; and Aboriginal Law; Indigenous Studies; International Law; Latin American Studies; Law and Society; Natural Resources and Conservation; Natural Resources Management and Policy; Social Policy; Sustainability; Transnational Law; Water Law; Water Resource Management; Kelsey; Kenney; McLeod; Wilkinson; First Nations
• Online Access: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/coping-with-water-scarcity-in-river-basins-worldwide/31; https://youtu.be/NeTDB4LjESk

SESSION FIVE: Wrap-Up: Themes, Cross-Cutting Issues, and Transferable Lessons 1:20 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. Panelists (for a facilitated audience Q&A session) Moderator: Doug Kenney, Getches-Wilkinson Center Panelists: John Fleck, University of New Mexico Kathy Jacobs, University of Arizona Kelsey Leonard, McMaster University Rebecca Tharme, Riverfutures Ltd. Tony McLeod, MDBA, Murray-Darling Basin Authority