Impact of ambiguity resolution and application of transformation parameters obtained by regional GNSS network in Precise Point Positioning
GNSS is one of the most used technique to monitor Reference Frame, Plate motion, Landslides, Structures, etc. Data acquired by GNSS satellites have to be processed considering models, approaches and strategies which are influencing the final results and, if wrongly done, may introduce biases. In thi...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Conference Object |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
AGU - American Geophysical Union
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11585/152855 http://fallmeeting.agu.org/2012/files/2012/12/Gandolfi_et_Al_PPP.pdf |
| Summary: | GNSS is one of the most used technique to monitor Reference Frame, Plate motion, Landslides, Structures, etc. Data acquired by GNSS satellites have to be processed considering models, approaches and strategies which are influencing the final results and, if wrongly done, may introduce biases. In this work the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) approach for GNSS data processing has been considered and investigated. As well-known PPP is faster and more flexible compared to the carrier phase differenced approach. On the other hand the differenced approach has been generally characterized by a better repeatability, especially for quite small baselines. Until few years ago one of the major limits of PPP was the impossibility to resolve the ambiguity as integer but nowadays some methods are available to resolve this aspect expecting an increasing of the precision. Starting from two subsets of the IGS Tracking network (one located in Europe and composed by 16 stations around Italy and another one, composed by 9 stations and located in Antarctica) processed respectively for 11 and 3 years, the impact of some data processing strategies has been considered. For both the networks different kind of solutions has been obtained, each one using more refined strategies, considering the ambiguity phase resolution, the possibility to frame the solution using global transformation parameters (provided by JPL), or framing the solution using regional transformation parameters. Furthermore, with the aim to evaluate in polar regions the impact of different tropospheric models in GNSS solutions the Antarctica network has been processed also considering the Vienna Mapping function instead of the Niell MF. The results will be synthetized by two parameters which are accuracy and precision: accuracy has been obtained comparing each solution with the reference ITRF2008 solution (ITRF2008-TRF-IGS.SNX.gz) and precision has been estimated considering the scattering of the solutions (time series) around a straight line obtained by a least square ... |
|---|