Characterization of the genetic profile of five Danish dog breeds

This investigation presents results from a genetic characterization of five Danish dog breeds genotyped on the CanineHD BeadChip microarray with 170K SNPs. The breeds investigated were 1) Danish Spitz (DS, n = 8), 2) Danish-Swedish farm Dog (DSF n = 18), 3) Broholmer (B, n = 22), 4) Old Danish Point...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Animal Science
Main Authors: Pertoldi, Cino, Kristensen, Torsten Nygaard, Loeschcke, Volker, Berg, Peer, Praebel, Anne, Stronen, Astrid Vik, Proschowsky, Helle Friis, Fredholm, Merete
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/characterization-of-the-genetic-profile-of-five-danish-dog-breeds(33901f0d-8b2c-4398-b1c9-111fa0a2c53b).html
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6617
Description
Summary:This investigation presents results from a genetic characterization of five Danish dog breeds genotyped on the CanineHD BeadChip microarray with 170K SNPs. The breeds investigated were 1) Danish Spitz (DS, n = 8), 2) Danish-Swedish farm Dog (DSF n = 18), 3) Broholmer (B, n = 22), 4) Old Danish Pointing Dog (ODP, n = 24), and 5) Greenland Dog (GD, n = 23). The aims of the investigation were to characterize the genetic profile of the abovementioned dog breeds by quantifying the genetic differentiation among them and the degree of genetic homogeneity within breeds. The genetic profile was determined by means of principal component analysis (PCA) and through a Bayesian clustering method. Both the PCA and the Bayesian clustering method revealed a clear genetic separation of the five breeds. The level of genetic variation within the breeds varied. The expected heterozygosity (HE) as well as the degree of polymorphism (P%) ranked the dog breeds in the order: DS > DSF > B > ODP > GD. Interestingly, the breed with a tenfold higher census population size compared to the other breeds, the Greenland Dog, had the lowest within-breed genetic variation, emphasizing that census size is a poor predictor of genetic variation. The observed differences in variation among and within dog breeds may be related to factors such as genetic drift, founder effects, genetic admixture and population bottlenecks. We further examined whether the observed genetic patterns in the five dog breeds can be used to design breeding strategies for the preservation of the genetic pool of these dog breeds.