A taxonomic study of the genus Nostoc in Antarctica

Typescript (photocopy) Thesis (MSc) -- University of Melbourne, School of Botany, 1982 Bibliography: leaves 78-87. This thesis provides written descriptions and illustrations of Antarctic specimens of Nostoc from both field and cultured material. The aims of the project were to provide the first det...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Garrick, Russell.
Format: Master Thesis
Language:English
Published: University of Melbourne 1981
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11343/341037
Description
Summary:Typescript (photocopy) Thesis (MSc) -- University of Melbourne, School of Botany, 1982 Bibliography: leaves 78-87. This thesis provides written descriptions and illustrations of Antarctic specimens of Nostoc from both field and cultured material. The aims of the project were to provide the first detailed morphological descriptions of Nostoc from Antarctica and to assess the three different taxonomic approaches currently in use for this genus and for blue-green algae in general. Eight samples of field material are shown to consist of colonies of just two distinctly different structures. Clonal cultures obtained from all of these are described in detail using defined, standardized culture conditions. Five morphologically distinct strains have been recognized from these eight samples. Additionally two distinct strains, previously isolated from field material of unrecorded morphology, have been incorporated into the study. Detailed observations on the morphology and life-cycles displayed by cultures have been made over a 12 week period. Seven genetically distinct strains are distinguished, essentially by plant-mass appearance, although microscopic characters are of importance in some. Two basic types of life-cycle are elucidated, one of which differs from those previously described in the literature. A key is presented which allows the identification of Nostoc strains in culture using these characters. An attempt is made to identify the isolates, and the field material from which they were derived, using three taxonomic approaches. The classical system (Geitler, 1932) is useful only on the field material which is assigned either to N. commune Vauch. or as being close to N. sphaericum Vauch. and N. fuscescens Fritsch. The revised classical system proposed by Drouet (1978) identifies all field and culture material as N. commune (Vauch.) Drouet. Some close correlations are made between cultured strains and those examined in culture by Kantz and Bold (1969). It is concluded that none of these three taxonomic ...