| Summary: | © 2016 Dr. Samantha San San Bui Behavioural responses of hosts to parasites or risk of infection can drive the success of parasites. Behaviour is a form of resistance or defence that is prevalent in many host-parasite systems, and can occur over fine- or broad-scales. With the meteoric rise of aquaculture and the associated proliferation of parasites with intensive farming systems, the behaviour of the fish being farmed has not been investigated in relation to infection avoidance. Epidemics and outbreaks of parasites are prevalent in every aquaculture system, and behaviour could be harnessed in concert with current methods to prevent and control parasites. But this requires a systematic understanding of the behaviours of the host, their capacity for resistance, and their interaction with the environment and the parasite. This thesis aims to provide knowledge on how host behaviour changes in response to a parasite, in an aquaculture context. I use the model system of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and the ectoparasitic salmon louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, which is a heavily researched host-parasite interaction whereby extensive information on both the host and parasite is available. However, even with the global focus on these species, anti-parasite behaviour has not been a primary objective. Over 4 data chapters, I characterise the behaviour and performance of salmon after lice infestation, and describe fine-scale behaviours of the host at the point of infestation. I also compare the behaviour and susceptibility of wild and farmed salmon to lice, to describe the effect of domestication the host-parasite relationship. In these studies, I found that there is a cost of infestation on the swimming performance of salmon carrying high lice loads. Salmon with infestations also changed their depth preferences in sea cages, whereby individuals with higher lice loads swam deeper in the cage, which would have reduced exposure to new infestation. In the tank environment, I also describe the suite of behaviours that confer protection against successful louse attachment, and further showed that these behavioural profiles were slightly different among wild and farmed salmon. Coupled with their behaviour, susceptibility to infestation was higher in farmed strains compared to two types of wild strains. Yet over time, farmed strains had a greater loss of lice compared to the retention rate in wild individuals. This has implications for management and prevention of infections in farmed salmon, and the survival and fitness of wild salmon populations. By providing basic understanding of the ability of salmon to prevent infestation, I found that Atlantic salmon have a fine-scale behaviour defence against salmon lice. The cost of infestation can be high as their swimming performance suffers with high lice loads. With the potential drive to prevent further infestation, they exhibited avoidance of the parasite-risky surface waters in sea cages when carrying a high lice load. While their behaviours can deter successful parasite attachment, farmed salmon are more susceptible to infestation when compared directly to wild salmon. There is the possibility that the salmon louse has co-adapted to the domestic strain of salmon, or alternatively, that selective breeding over generations of salmon farming has produced a phenotype that is physiologically vulnerable to infestation. From these results, I have shown that behaviour provides a means of protection against infestation in an intensively farmed fish, which opens the potential for behaviour to be incorporated into aquaculture management practices. The aquaculture industry, of Atlantic salmon but also other finfish species, provides a substantial proportion of the global demand for animal protein. Aquaculture’s use of and effect on natural resources is at a much more sustainable level compared to terrestrial agriculture, and managing parasites with alternative methods than medicinal compounds will keep the industry’s trajectory aimed at minimal environment impacts and positive animal welfare.
|
|---|