Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in the NICE birth cohort: an assessment of self-selection bias

Background: Prospective birth cohorts are essential for identifying associations between exposures and outcomes. However, voluntary participation introduces a potential bias due to self selection since the persons that chose to participate may differ in background characteristics and behaviors. Obje...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Main Authors: Ögge, Linda Englund, Murray, Fiona, Modzelewska, Dominika, Lundqvist, Robert, Nilsson, Staffan, Carré, Helena, Kippler, Maria, Wold, Agnes E., Sandberg, Ann-Sofie, Sandin, Anna, Jacobsson, Bo, Barman, Malin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Umeå universitet, Institutionen för odontologi 2022
Subjects:
enrollment bias
NICE birth cohort
pregnancy cohort
self selection bias
self-selection
Obstetrics
Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Reproduktionsmedicin och gynekologi
Northern Sweden
Norrbotten
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-191186
https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.2011854
Description
Summary:Background: Prospective birth cohorts are essential for identifying associations between exposures and outcomes. However, voluntary participation introduces a potential bias due to self selection since the persons that chose to participate may differ in background characteristics and behaviors. Objectives: To investigate potential bias due to self-selection in the Nutritional impact onImmunological maturation duringChildhood in relation to theEnvironment (NICE) birth cohort in northern Sweden. Methods: Women in the NICE birth cohort (N = 621) were compared to nonparticipating pregnant women in Norrbotten County in northern Sweden who were eligible for participation (N = 4976) regarding maternal characteristics and lifestyle. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups and associations between exposures (smoking, folic acid, BMI, parity, education) and pregnancy outcomes (birth weight and gestational age) were analyzed by linear regression analyses, examining any interaction with the group. Results: NICE participants were more highly educated, older and more likely to cohabit than the non-participants. They more often took folic acid and multivitamin supplements and less often smoked during early pregnancy. Pregnancy outcomes (mode of delivery, gestational age at delivery, birth weight and APGAR score) did, however, not differ significantly between participants and non-participants. Smoking, BMI, education and parity affected gestational age and birth weight, but the associations were of similar magnitude in participants and non-participants, with no significant effect on the group. Conclusion: Self-selection to the NICE study was evident in some factors related to lifestyle and socioeconomic characteristics but did not appear to skew pregnancy outcomes or alter well-known effects of certain lifestyle parameters on pregnancy outcomes.

Similar Items