Ã…land as a Special Case : From Monolith to Diverse?

The present article discusses two sets of issues. On the one hand, I consider the different factors and circumstances which have influenced relations between Swedish and Finnish on Ã…land and the implications of political change. On the other hand, I discuss the ways in which these are understood an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Northern Studies
Main Author: Nihtinen, Atina
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Ã…bo Akademi Jubileumsfond, Finland; Department of History, Ã…bo Akademi University, Turku, Finland 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-145842
https://doi.org/10.36368/jns.v11i2.886
Description
Summary:The present article discusses two sets of issues. On the one hand, I consider the different factors and circumstances which have influenced relations between Swedish and Finnish on Ã…land and the implications of political change. On the other hand, I discuss the ways in which these are understood and presented in history writing. By considering continuity and change in history writing and language discussions I argue that history writing has changed from a rather monolithic interpretation rooted in nationalism and the early decades of autonomy towards a more versatile interpretation (such as considering Ã…land as being connected to both east and west and ideas such as many Ã…lands). At the same time the role of Swedish remains important, both as a matter of continuity (history) and as a matter of its instrumental function.