The great March 25, 1998, Antarctic Plate earthquake: Moment tensor and rupture history

• Published in: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
• Main Authors: Henry, C, Das, S, Woodhouse, J
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2016
• Subjects: Antarctic; Antarc*
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900077; https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:6fe96afc-34b9-4c1a-ad68-d1adb1c66165

We use broadband body and mantle wave data to study the 1998 Antarctic intraplate earthquake. The centroid moment tensor (CMT) has a large non-double-couple component. There exist two pure double-couple constrained solutions that fit the data almost equally well. The frequent practice of taking the "best double-couple" gives a far from optimal solution. We use P and SH body waves to determine the rupture parameters of the first and larger of the two observed subevents. The best rupture plane, with strike 96°, dip 69°, and rake -18°, is compatible with only one of the two CMT solutions: strike 96°, dip 64°, rake -23°, centroid location (63.1° S, 148.4° E, 10 km depth), centroid time 0313:02 UT, and M0=1.3× 1021 N m (Mw = 8.0). The first subevent is a simple, primarily westward propagating ∼140-km rupture, of ∼45-s duration, with average velocity ≳3 km s-1; it has a seismic moment of 1.2 × 1021 N m (Mw = 8.0), with 75% of its moment released between 10 and 27 s, and a stress drop of ∼240 bars. The rupture is physically bounded by two fracture zones at 147.5° E and 150° E. The second subevent lasted from 70 to 90 s on a fault extending from 210 to 270 km west of the epicenter, with a moment of 0.3-0.6 × 1021 N m (Mw = 7.6-7.8). This is a spectacular example of dynamic stress triggering over a 100-km separation distance with a time delay of ∼40 s. The complex pattern of aftershocks is primarily controlled by preexisting fracture zones on the ocean floor. Copyright 2000 by the American Geophysical Union.