International legal implications of climate change for the polar regions: "too much, too little, too late"?
Climate change is by definition both a global and a regional issue. Perhaps this paradox is most evident in the polar regions where regional change and global impact coexist. This paper does not deny the importance of the global climate change regime, but opts instead to consider the role of those i...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Melbourne
2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/5175/ https://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/5175/1/French.pdf http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbJIL/2009/33.html |
| Summary: | Climate change is by definition both a global and a regional issue. Perhaps this paradox is most evident in the polar regions where regional change and global impact coexist. This paper does not deny the importance of the global climate change regime, but opts instead to consider the role of those institutions which can most affect the particularities of the polar context, namely the Arctic Council and the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings. The original perception that climate change is not an issue which can be addressed regionally is slowely beginning to change. There are (at least) three areas where action can be taken by polar states: mitigation, adaptation and representation. Despite recent scientific and policy initiatives however, climate change remains under-regulated in the polar regions. Thus, there is too much rhetoric and too little regulation. Unfortunately, before we get a chance to resolve this conundrum, the global reality may overtake the normative endeavour; ie. it may also be too late. |
|---|