Validations of satellite ozone profiles in austral spring using ozonesonde measurements in the Jang Bogo station, Antarctica

Using ozonesonde measurements from 2015 to 2018 at the Jang Bogo station located in the southeastern Antarctic region, we evaluate ozone profiles retrieved from the three satellite measurements that are widely used: Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS), and Ozone Mapping P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Research
Main Authors: Lee, Hana, Choi, Taejin, Kim, Seong-Joong, Bak, Juseon, Ahn, Dha Hyun, Kramarova, Natalya Alekseyevna, Park, Sang Seo, Kim, Jhoon, Koo, Ja-Ho
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE 2022
Subjects:
Antarctic
Austral
Bogo
Antarc*
Antarctica
Online Access:https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/59752
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114087
Description
Summary:Using ozonesonde measurements from 2015 to 2018 at the Jang Bogo station located in the southeastern Antarctic region, we evaluate ozone profiles retrieved from the three satellite measurements that are widely used: Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS), and Ozone Mapping Profiler Suite (OMPS) data. For the fair validation, ozonesonde profiles are smoothed using the weighting function of each satellite retrieval algorithm (i.e., convolution process). Compared with limb-viewing MLS and OMPS ozone profiles, the OMI ozone profiles are relatively less qualified: coarser vertical resolution and larger inter-annual variation. Nevertheless, our validation reveals that the quality of all three satellite ozone profiles looks comparable; In general, difference from ozonesonde profile is similar to 1 ppm absolutely, and -20 to 30% relatively at maximum. This quantitative range well corresponds to previous work, meaning that our new validation confirms the reliability of satellite ozone profiles in the southeastern Antarctic region where the measurement data for the validation were not enough. Another interesting feature is the role of a priori ozone profile; Nadir-viewing OMI satellite can have qualified ozone profiles by a proper assumption of a priori ozone profile. Since the performance of limb-viewing ozone profiles is better, however, the careful usage of nadir-viewing ozone profile is still required. We think that the simultaneous usage of multiple satellite ozone profiles can contribute to better understanding of Antarctic ozone characteristics.

Similar Items