Evaluation of the representation of Arctic sea ice in the UK Hadley Centre GCM

The amount of Arctic sea ice predicted by the Hadley Centre Global Climate Model (GCM) is evaluated using 15 years of passive-microwave data. While the Hadley model reproduces the seasonal cycle reasonably well, it underestimates the total area of sea ice by more than 3 x 10(6) km(2) for most of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Smith, DM, Cooper, C, Wingham, DJ, Laxon, SW
Other Authors: Walsh, JE
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: INT GLACIOLOGICAL SOC 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/154907/
Description
Summary:The amount of Arctic sea ice predicted by the Hadley Centre Global Climate Model (GCM) is evaluated using 15 years of passive-microwave data. While the Hadley model reproduces the seasonal cycle reasonably well, it underestimates the total area of sea ice by more than 3 x 10(6) km(2) for most of the year. In the winter months, most of the underestimate in ice area results from the prediction of far too little ice in Hudson Bay and the Sea of Okhotsk, leading to an excess of up to 0.2 PW heat input to the atmosphere from Hudson Bay alone. The surface-energy budget of Hudson Bay is investigated using a mixture of surface observations (POLES), satellite data (ATSR, SSM/I and ISCCP) and output from the Goddard Data Assimilation Office analysis. Flux adjustments of the order of 200 Wm(-2), resulting from anomalously high sea-surface temperatures in the Levitus (1982) climatology, are found to be the cause of the model's underestimation of sea ice in both Hudson Bay and the Sea of Okhotsk. The fact that flux adjustments based on an inaccurate climatology will produce errors, even if the model physics is correct, underlines the need both for improved climatologies and for models accurate enough not to require flux adjustment.