Global 3-D Simulations of the Triple Oxygen Isotope Signature Δ17O in Atmospheric CO2

The triple oxygen isotope signature Δ¹⁷O in atmospheric CO₂, also known as its “¹⁷O excess,” has been proposed as a tracer for gross primary production (the gross uptake of CO₂ by vegetation through photosynthesis). We present the first global 3-D model simulations for Δ¹⁷O in atmospheric CO₂ togeth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Koren, Gerbrand, Schneider, Linda, Velde, Ivar R. van der, Schaik, Erik van, Gromov, Sergey S., Adnew, Getachew A., Mrozek Martino, Dorota J., Hofmann, Magdalena E. G., Liang, Mao-Chang, Mahata, Sasadhar, Bergamaschi, Peter, Laan-Luijkx, Ingrid T. van der, Krol, Maarten C., Röckmann, Thomas, Peters, Wouter
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: John Wiley and Sons 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000099372
https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000099372/45922440
https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000099372
Description
Summary:The triple oxygen isotope signature Δ¹⁷O in atmospheric CO₂, also known as its “¹⁷O excess,” has been proposed as a tracer for gross primary production (the gross uptake of CO₂ by vegetation through photosynthesis). We present the first global 3-D model simulations for Δ¹⁷O in atmospheric CO₂ together with a detailed model description and sensitivity analyses. In our 3-D model framework we include the stratospheric source of Δ¹⁷O in CO₂ and the surface sinks from vegetation, soils, ocean, biomass burning, and fossil fuel combustion. The effect of oxidation of atmospheric CO on Δ¹⁷O in CO2 is also included in our model. We estimate that the global mean Δ¹⁷O (defined as Δ¹⁷O = ln(???? ¹⁷O + 1) − ????RL · ln(???? ¹⁸O + 1) with ????RL = 0.5229) of CO₂ in the lowest 500 m of the atmosphere is 39.6 per meg, which is ∼20 per meg lower than estimates from existing box models. We compare our model results with a measured stratospheric Δ¹⁷O in CO₂ profile from Sodankylä (Finland), which shows good agreement. In addition, we compare our model results with tropospheric measurements of Δ¹⁷O in CO₂ from Göttingen (Germany) and Taipei (Taiwan), which shows some agreement but we also find substantial discrepancies that are subsequently discussed. Finally, we show model results for Zotino (Russia), Mauna Loa (United States), Manaus (Brazil), and South Pole, which we propose as possible locations for future measurements of Δ¹⁷O in tropospheric CO₂ that can help to further increase our understanding of the global budget of Δ¹⁷O in atmospheric CO₂ ...