Poissaolevan politiikkaa. Historia ja perinteinen kulttuuri nenetsien etnisyyden rakennusaineina

The article deals with Nenets ethnicity and its connections with history and tradition, and it is based on the ethnographic fieldwork made in Nenets autonomous okrug in periods of varying length in 2000, 2003, 2004 and 2005. Besides participant observation and interviews, the material consists of ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Elore
Main Author: Lukin, Karina
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Finnish
Published: Suomen Kansantietouden Tutkijain Seura 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.fi/elore/article/view/78519
https://doi.org/10.30666/elore.78519
Description
Summary:The article deals with Nenets ethnicity and its connections with history and tradition, and it is based on the ethnographic fieldwork made in Nenets autonomous okrug in periods of varying length in 2000, 2003, 2004 and 2005. Besides participant observation and interviews, the material consists of archive and news paper material and literature describing Nenets history. I use the terms ethnicity, heritage, and politics of history as key concepts with which I define how Nenets ethnicity is constructed and articulated around the discussion about the fortification of Pustozersk and its 500th anniversary in 1999. The Nenets opened their own monument, Hèbidja Ten, during the anniversary celebrations and thus brought out a differing memory of the past. This evoked many debates over the right way of telling the history. Describing discussions about history, the opening ceremony, and also other activities of Nenets intelligentsia, this article argues that Nenets ethnicity is constructed on two absents, namely the traditional way of life and the glorious history. Still, in the current post-Soviet context, these two are made meaningful parts of Nenets ethnicity. The article deals with Nenets ethnicity and its connections with history and tradition, and it is based on the ethnographic fieldwork made in Nenets autonomous okrug in periods of varying length in 2000, 2003, 2004 and 2005. Besides participant observation and interviews, the material consists of archive and news paper material and literature describing Nenets history. I use the terms ethnicity, heritage, and politics of history as key concepts with which I define how Nenets ethnicity is constructed and articulated around the discussion about the fortification of Pustozersk and its 500th anniversary in 1999. The Nenets opened their own monument, Hèbidja Ten, during the anniversary celebrations and thus brought out a differing memory of the past. This evoked many debates over the right way of telling the history. Describing discussions about history, the opening ceremony, and also other activities of Nenets intelligentsia, this article argues that Nenets ethnicity is constructed on two absents, namely the traditional way of life and the glorious history. Still, in the current post-Soviet context, these two are made meaningful parts of Nenets ethnicity.