| Summary: | Prispevek obravnava Backhausov prikaz marksistične sekundarne literature h kritiki politične ekonomije. Pri tem prikazu ne gre za poskus "objektivne" razvrstitve obstoječih marksističnih interpretacij, ampak za zaris pojmovne mreže nujnega "vnaprejšnjega razumevanja" Marxove in Engelsove teorije, skozi katero mora danes vsaka imanentna razlaga njune teorije. Backhausove lastne analize lahko opredelimo, teoretsko-zgodovinsko gledano, kot začetek "tretje faze" v razlagi kritike politične ekonomije: kot kritično razdelavo vrzeli, ki jih je potlačitev konstitutivne "filozofske" ravni Marxove in Engelsove teorije povzročila ne le na področju ekonomske teorije marksizma, ampak tudi v sami "potlačeni" marksistični filozofiji. The contribution discusses Backhaus’ presentation of Marxist secondary literature on criticism of the political economy. It is not an attempt to ‘objectively’ classify existing marksist interpretations, but rather a conceptual network of the necessary ‘preliminary understanding’ of Marxova and Engels’ theory, through which every imaginative interpretation of their theory must now be given. Backhaus’ own analysis can be identified, theoretically and historically, as the beginning of the ‘third stage’ in the interpretation of the criticism of the political economy: as a critical reflection of the gaps caused by the delaying of the constitutive ‘phylosophic’ levels of Marxova and Engels’ theory, not only in the field of the economic theory of Marxism, but also in the ‘hosted’ Marxist philosophy itself.
|
|---|