Technical note: Turbulence measurements from a light autonomous underwater vehicle

A self-contained turbulence instrument from Rockland Scientific was installed on a light autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) from OceanScan Marine Systems and Technology Lda. We report on the data quality and discuss limitations of dissipation estimated from two shear probes during a deployment in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Science
Main Authors: E. H. Kolås, T. Mo-Bjørkelund, I. Fer
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-389-2022
https://os.copernicus.org/articles/18/389/2022/os-18-389-2022.pdf
https://doaj.org/article/e4273395e39545bdbd8bb9c1e0a44270
Description
Summary:A self-contained turbulence instrument from Rockland Scientific was installed on a light autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) from OceanScan Marine Systems and Technology Lda. We report on the data quality and discuss limitations of dissipation estimated from two shear probes during a deployment in the Barents Sea in February 2021. The AUV mission lasted for 5 h, operating at a typical horizontal speed of 1.1 m s−1. The AUV was programmed to find and cross the maximum along-path thermal gradient at 10, 20 and 30 m depths along 4 km transects. Although the AUV vibrations contaminate the shear probe records, the noise is mitigated by removing vibration-induced components from shear spectra using the accelerometer signal measured in multiple directions. Dissipation rate estimates in the observed transects varied in the range 1×10-8 and 6×10-6 W kg−1, with the values from the two orthogonal probes typically in agreement to within a factor of 2. Dissipation estimates from the AUV show good agreement with nearby vertical microstructure profiles obtained from the ship during the transects, indicating that the turbulence measurements from the AUV are reliable for this relatively turbulent environment. However, the lowest reliable dissipation rates are limited to 5×10-8 W kg−1, making this setup unfit for use in quiescent environments.