Contrasts between the cryoconite and ice-marginal bacterial communities of Svalbard glaciers

Cryoconite holes are foci of unusually high microbial diversity and activity on glacier surfaces worldwide, comprising melt-holes formed by the darkening of ice by biogenic granular debris. Despite recent studies linking cryoconite microbial community structure to the functionality of cryoconite hab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Research
Main Authors: Arwyn Edwards, Sara M.E. Rassner, Alexandre M. Anesio, Hilary J. Worgan, Tristram D.L. Irvine-Fynn, Hefin Wyn Williams, Birgit Sattler, Gareth Wyn Griffith
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Norwegian Polar Institute 2013
Subjects:
Cryoconite
glacier
Svalbard
moraines
niche
T-RFLP
envir
geo
Arctic
Polar Research
Tundra
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v32i0.19468
https://doaj.org/article/a6b54f251826445bbc96176be8927806
Description
Summary:Cryoconite holes are foci of unusually high microbial diversity and activity on glacier surfaces worldwide, comprising melt-holes formed by the darkening of ice by biogenic granular debris. Despite recent studies linking cryoconite microbial community structure to the functionality of cryoconite habitats, little is known of the processes shaping the cryoconite bacterial community. In particular, the assertions that the community is strongly influenced by aeolian transfer of biota from ice-marginal habitats and the potential for cryoconite microbes to inoculate proglacial habitats are poorly quantified despite their longevity in the literature. Therefore, the bacterial community structures of cryoconite holes on three High-Arctic glaciers were compared to bacterial communities in adjacent moraines and tundra using terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Distinct community structures for cryoconite and ice-marginal communities were observed. Only a minority of phylotypes are present in both habitat types, implying that cryoconite habitats comprise distinctive niches for bacterial taxa when compared to ice-marginal habitats. Curiously, phylotype abundance distributions for both cryoconite and ice-marginal sites best fit models relating to succession. Our analyses demonstrate clearly that cryoconites have their own, distinct functional microbial communities despite significant inputs of cells from other habitats.

Similar Items