Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)

The use of biologging instruments has greatly improved our understanding of the behaviour, physiology and ecology of free-ranging marine mammals. However, handling wild animals and attaching instruments to streamlined bodies can cause stress and potentially influence behaviour and swimming/diving en...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Research
Main Authors: Marie-Anne Blanchet, Christian Lydersen, Martin Biuw, P.J. Nico de Bruyn, Greg Hofmeyr, Bjørn A. Krafft, Kit M. Kovacs
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Norwegian Polar Institute 2014
Subjects:
geo
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v33.21630
https://doaj.org/article/92e9c2e2fa9d4aa2bff76162cd45d457
Description
Summary:The use of biologging instruments has greatly improved our understanding of the behaviour, physiology and ecology of free-ranging marine mammals. However, handling wild animals and attaching instruments to streamlined bodies can cause stress and potentially influence behaviour and swimming/diving energetics. The goals of this study, undertaken on Bouvetøya, were (1) to determine if the first trip to sea after instrumentation is representative of subsequent trips in lactating Antarctic fur seals, to explore potential handling effects and assess possible biases in having multiple short-duration deployments (inflating N, using a limited number of tags) and (2) to evaluate potential effects of two different instrument combinations (SMRU satellite data relay loggers and very high frequency radio transmitters versus Wildlife Computers time–depth recorders and very high frequency radio transmitters) on trip durations, dive parameters, female body condition and pup growth. Handling did not appear to have any effects on the parameters studied; data from the first and second trips did not differ significantly. This implies that multiple short-term deployments are unlikely to result in biased data in this species. Instrument type did have measurable effects; time-at-sea was greater and pup growth was lower for pairs in which mothers carried bulkier instruments. This suggests that instrument streamlining is important to avoid negative impacts and that bulkier equipment should be deployed on lactating females with caution and only for short periods. The study highlights that instrument effects should be taken into account when comparing data from experiments collected using different equipment packages.