Contrasting Hydroclimatic Model‐Data Agreements Over the Nordic‐Arctic Region

• Published in: Earth's Future
• Main Authors: A. Bring, R. Goldenberg, Z. Kalantari, C. Prieto, Y. Ma, J. Jarsjö, G. Destouni
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2019
• Subjects: Hydroclimatology; Land/atmosphere interactions; Modeling; Climate model evaluation; High‐latitude climate; Arctic region; envir; geo; Arctic
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001296; https://doaj.org/article/8205b778a9914fedbe8736be59564f94

Abstract Rapid changes in high‐latitude hydroclimate have important implications for human societies and environment. Previous studies of different regions have indicated better agreement between climate model results and observation data for the thermodynamic variable of surface air temperature (T) than for the water variables of precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET), and runoff (R). Here we compare climate model output with observations for 64 Nordic and Arctic hydrological basins of different sizes, and for the whole region combined. We find an unexpectedly high agreement between models and observations for R, about as high as the model‐observation agreement for T and distinctly higher than that for P or ET. Model‐observation agreement for R and T is also consistently higher on the whole‐region scale than individual basin scales. In contrast, model‐observation agreement for P and ET is overall lower, and for some error measures also lower for the whole region than for individual basins of various scales. Region‐specific soil freeze–thaw bias of climate models can at least partly explain the low model‐observation agreement for P and ET, while leaving modeled R relatively unaffected. Thereby, model projections for this region may be similarly reliable and directly useful for large‐scale average conditions of R as of T.