Short Circuit: A Failing Technology for Administering Justice in Nunavut

If all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail, but if all you have is a circuit court what happens to the administration of justice? This paper explores the history and contemporary usages of the itinerant ‘circuit court’ in the Canadian Arctic. Presenting the circuit court as a technolog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice
Main Author: David Matyas
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
French
Published: University of Windsor 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5787
https://doaj.org/article/68b73533c5bd436d99f7a3f02449b3e4
Description
Summary:If all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail, but if all you have is a circuit court what happens to the administration of justice? This paper explores the history and contemporary usages of the itinerant ‘circuit court’ in the Canadian Arctic. Presenting the circuit court as a technology of justice, the paper explores why and how this instrument has been employed and the possibilities it constrains. Looking to the challenges of administering justice in contemporary Nunavut, the paper argues that a different type of technology may be needed: One that facilitates work, rather than exercises control; allows for specialized outcomes in place of compliant results; and that focusses on the growth of justice instead of products that are just. The paper concludes by exploring the local, sedentary, judge-based system of Greenland—steeped in its civilian procedural law—as a compelling alternative technology to the circuit court in Nunavut.