The equivalence of two definitions of sequential pseudocompactness

SWORD We show that two possible definitions of sequential pseudocompactness are equivalent, and point out some consequences.[EN] Lipparini, P. (2016). The equivalence of two definitions of sequential pseudocompactness. Applied General Topology. 17(1):1-5. doi:10.4995/agt.2016.4616. Artico, G., Marco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied General Topology
Main Author: Lipparini, Paolo
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Universitat Politècnica de València 2016
Subjects:
phil
hist
Stephenson
artico
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4995/agt.2016.4616
http://hdl.handle.net/10251/72369
Description
Summary:SWORD We show that two possible definitions of sequential pseudocompactness are equivalent, and point out some consequences.[EN] Lipparini, P. (2016). The equivalence of two definitions of sequential pseudocompactness. Applied General Topology. 17(1):1-5. doi:10.4995/agt.2016.4616. Artico, G., Marconi, U., Pelant, J., Rotter, L., & Tkachenko, M. (2002). Selections and suborderability. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 175(1), 1-33. doi:10.4064/fm175-1-1 Dow, A., Porter, J. R., Stephenson, R. M., & Grant Woods, R. (2004). Spaces whose Pseudocompact Subspaces are Closed Subsets. Applied General Topology, 5(2), 243. doi:10.4995/agt.2004.1973 1 5 17

Similar Items