Data from: Northern bottlenose whales in a pristine environment respond strongly to close and distant navy sonar signals

Impact assessments for sonar operations typically use received sound levels to predict behavioural disturbance in marine mammals. However, there are indications that cetaceans may learn to associate exposures from distant sound sources with lower perceived risk. To investigate the roles of source di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wensveen, Paul, Isojunno, Saana, Hansen, Rune, Von Benda-Beckmann, Alexander, Kleivane, Lars, Van IJsselmuide, Sander, Lam, Frans-Peter, Kvadsheim, Petter, DeRuiter, Stacy, Curé, Charlotte, Narazaki, Tomoko, Tyack, Peter, Miller, Patrick
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: Dryad 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.fc5c0s4
Description
Summary:Impact assessments for sonar operations typically use received sound levels to predict behavioural disturbance in marine mammals. However, there are indications that cetaceans may learn to associate exposures from distant sound sources with lower perceived risk. To investigate the roles of source distance and received level in an area without frequent sonar activity, we conducted multi-scale controlled exposure experiments (n = 3) with 12 northern bottlenose whales near Jan Mayen, Norway. Animals were tagged with high-resolution archival tags (n = 1 per experiment) or medium-resolution satellite tags (n = 9 in total) and subsequently exposed to sonar. We also deployed bottom-moored recorders to acoustically monitor for whales in the exposed area. Tagged whales initiated avoidance of the sound source over a wide range of distances (0.8–28 km), with responses characteristic of beaked whales. Both onset and intensity of response were better predicted by received sound pressure level (SPL) than by source distance. Avoidance threshold SPLs estimated for each whale ranged from 117–126 dB re 1 µPa, comparable to those of other tagged beaked whales. In this pristine underwater acoustic environment, we found no indication that the source distances tested in our experiments modulated the behavioural effects of sonar, as has been suggested for locations where whales are frequently exposed to sonar. Acoustic detections of bottlenose whalesData from two PAM recordings: JM1 (2015) and JM5 (2016)NBWdetections.xlsxScript to analyse acoustic detectionsScript to plot the 2015 and 2016 data and calculate the empirical CDF of the pre-exposure click-absent periods for 2016PAM_analysis.mSatellite tag data for HMM analysisARGOS tracks filtered with R package crawl.sat-tag-data.RDataDTAG data for Response Intensity analysisMahalanobis distance timeseries data from DTAGs for modelling of the response intensity indexDTAG-data.RDataScript to analysis DTAG dataModelling of response intensity index sensu DeRuiter et al. (2013), Biology ...