First indications that northern bottlenose whales are sensitive to behavioural disturbance from anthropogenic noise

Contributions of P.M., P.T., C.C., S.D., F.V., P.W., L.M.L., T.N. and S.H. were funded by the US Office of Naval Research. Contributions of P.K., L.K. and L.S. were funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Defence. Contributions of F.L., S.v.IJ. and A.v.B. were funded by The Netherlands Ministry of Defen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Royal Society Open Science
Main Authors: Charlotte Curé, Fleur Visser, Petter H. Kvadsheim, Frans-Peter A. Lam, Stacy L. DeRuiter, Peter L. Tyack, Sascha K. Hooker, Tomoko Narazaki, Patrick J. O. Miller, Lars Kleivane, S.P. van IJsselmuide, A.M. von Benda-Beckmann, L. M. Martín López, Lise Doksæter Sivle, Paul J. Wensveen
Other Authors: University of St Andrews.School of Biology, University of St Andrews.Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland, University of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews.Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciences, University of St Andrews.Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolution, University of St Andrews.Bioacoustics group, University of St Andrews.Sea Mammal Research Unit, University of St Andrews.Sound Tags Group, University of St Andrews.St Andrews Sustainability Institute, Unité Mixte de Recherche en Acoustique Environnementale (UMRAE ), Centre d'Etudes et d'Expertise sur les Risques, l'Environnement, la Mobilité et l'Aménagement (Cerema)-Université Gustave Eiffel
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
DAS
BDC
R2C
69
14
25
geo
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.140484
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02915550
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsos.140484
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140484
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.140484
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4632540
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26543576
https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2374373
https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai%3Atudelft.nl%3Auuid%3A4fb74da1-ab79-4d10-a23d-f6466ff695de
https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/handle/10023/6872
https://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/2/6/140484
https://repository.tudelft.nl/view/tno/uuid:4fb74da1-ab79-4d10-a23d-f6466ff695de
https://www.openchannels.org/literature/9927
https://core.ac.uk/display/85542789
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2161598784
http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:4fb74da1-ab79-4d10-a23d-f6466ff695de
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2374373
Description
Summary:Contributions of P.M., P.T., C.C., S.D., F.V., P.W., L.M.L., T.N. and S.H. were funded by the US Office of Naval Research. Contributions of P.K., L.K. and L.S. were funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Defence. Contributions of F.L., S.v.IJ. and A.v.B. were funded by The Netherlands Ministry of Defence. Fieldwork contributions of L.M.L. and T.N. were funded by the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP). The analysis component of L.M.L.'s contribution was funded by DGA French Ministry of Defence. P.T. acknowledges the support of the MASTS pooling initiative (The Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland) in the completion of this study. MASTS is funded by the Scottish Funding Council (grant no. HR09011) and contributing institutions. Although northern bottlenose whales were the most heavily hunted beaked whale, we have little information about this species in its remote habitat of the North Atlantic Ocean. Underwater anthropogenic noise and disruption of their natural habitat may be major threats, given the sensitivity of other beaked whales to such noise disturbance. We attached dataloggers to 13 northern bottlenose whales and compared their natural sounds and movements to those of one individual exposed to escalating levels of 1–2 kHz upsweep naval sonar signals. At a received sound pressure level (SPL) of 98 dB re 1 μPa, the whale turned to approach the sound source, but at a received SPL of 107 dB re 1 μPa, the whale began moving in an unusually straight course and then made a near 180° turn away from the source, and performed the longest and deepest dive (94 min, 2339 m) recorded for this species. Animal movement parameters differed significantly from baseline for more than 7 h until the tag fell off 33–36 km away. No clicks were emitted during the response period, indicating cessation of normal echolocation-based foraging. A sharp decline in both acoustic and visual detections of conspecifics after exposure suggests other whales in the area responded similarly. Though ...