Crustal accretion at high temperature spreading centres: Rheological control of crustal thickness
Abstract New determinations of lateral crustal thickness variations at anomalous oceanic spreading centres such as Iceland have shown that the crust may be thinner at the ridge axis above the plume thickening towards the sides (Bjarnason and Schmeling, 2009). To understand this behaviour crustal acc...
| Published in: | Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2262/63585 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2010.10.004 |
| Summary: | Abstract New determinations of lateral crustal thickness variations at anomalous oceanic spreading centres such as Iceland have shown that the crust may be thinner at the ridge axis above the plume thickening towards the sides (Bjarnason and Schmeling, 2009). To understand this behaviour crustal accretion models have been carried out solving the conservation equations of mass, momentum and energy with melting, melt extraction, and feedback of extracted material as newly formed crust for an extending lithosphere system underlain by a hot mantle plume. The dynamics of rifting are thermally and rheologically controlled by the feedback due to accreted new crust. Four accretional modes with characteristic crustal thickness variations are identified depending on the width of the volcanic emplacement zone, the accretional heating rate, which can be associated with the thickness of the surface layer in which magmatic emplacement takes place, and the spreading rate. Mode 1: Zero crustal thickness at the spreading axis develops for cool accretion and a wide emplacement zone. Mode 2: Strongly or moderately crustal thickening away from the axis develops in case of warm (deep reaching) accretion and wide emplacement zones. Mode 3: Nearly constant crustal thickness develops in case of warm (deep reaching) accretion but narrow emplacement zones. Dynamic topography of mode 3 shows only a weak or no regional minimum at all near the axis. Mode 2 or 3 may be identified with the situation in Iceland. Mode 4: A stagnating central crustal block evolves for cool accretion and narrow emplacement. This mode disappears for increasing spreading rates. No accretional mode with maximum crustal thickness above the plume at the rift axis has been found. The absence of mode 1 accretion (with zero crust at ridge axis) on earth may be an indication that in general crustal accretion is not cold (and shallow). The model is also applied to other hotspot-ridge settings (Azores, Galapagos) and suggests mode 2 to 3 accretion. Department of Geology and Geophysics - SOEST--> , 1680 East-West Rd. University of Hawaii--> , Honolulu--> , HI 96822--> - (Schmeling, Harro) GERMANY (Schmeling, Harro) GERMANY Received: 2009-10-07 Revised: 2010-09-27 Accepted: 2010-10-02 |
|---|