A quality assurance study of the development of quality of care in outpatient clinics for treatment of addiction in Greenland

Introduction: In 2016, a new addiction treatment service, Allorfik, was introduced in Greenland. Allorfik has, throughout the implementation and after, used auditing of patient records with feedback to develop the quality of care in treatment. Audits and feedback are routinely done in each treatment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Main Authors: Flyger, Julie, Mejldal, Anna, Nielsen, Bent, Niclasen, Birgit, Nielsen, Anette Søgaard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/da/publications/bbf88b6b-daee-44ae-aa91-f349f009a7c9
https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2329583
https://findresearcher.sdu.dk/ws/files/266009435/A_quality_assurance_study_of_the_development_of_quality_of_care_in_outpatient_clinics_for_treatment_of_addiction_in_Greenland.pdf
Description
Summary:Introduction: In 2016, a new addiction treatment service, Allorfik, was introduced in Greenland. Allorfik has, throughout the implementation and after, used auditing of patient records with feedback to develop the quality of care in treatment. Audits and feedback are routinely done in each treatment center. This study wishes to investigate the development of the quality of treatment through the case notes from the journal audits. Methodology: This study is based on case notes audits from 2019, 2020 and 2021. In the audits, the focus has been on the quality of documentation and content for ten specific areas in each patient record. Each area was scored on a Likert scale of 0–4 for both outcomes. Statistical analyses were done using Stata 17, and P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. We present baseline characteristics for patients and illustrate the development of quality for both outcomes as time trends with scatter plots. Results: The analysis was based on data from 454 patients and audits of their case notes. The mean number of weeks in treatment is 12.72, and the mean age for the people in the audited case notes is 39. Time had a positive effect on both outcomes, and so each month, documentation increased by 0.21 points (p-value = <0.001), and content increased by 0.27 points (p-value = <0.001). Conclusion: For documentation and content, the quality level has increased significantly with time, and the quality of case notes is at an excellent level at the final audits of all treatment centers.