Killer whale (Orcinus orca) population dynamics in response to a period of rapid ecosystem change in the eastern North Atlantic

• Published in: Ecology and Evolution
• Main Authors: Jourdain, Eve, Goh, Tiffany, Kuningas, Sanna, Similä, Tiu, Vongraven, Dag, Karoliussen, Richard, Bisther, Anna, Hammond, Philip S.
• Other Authors: University of St Andrews. School of Biology, University of St Andrews. Sea Mammal Research Unit, University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2021
• Subjects: Abundance; Apparent survival; Capture heterogeneity; Killer whale; Photo-identification; Population dynamics; GC Oceanography; GE Environmental Sciences; QH301 Biology; DAS; SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities; SDG 14 - Life Below Water; GC; GE; QH301; Killer Whale; North Atlantic; Orca; Orcinus orca
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/10023/24407; https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8364

Fieldwork and study conducted by SK received financial support by the University of St Andrews studentship, SMRU Ltd., the Russell Trust Award and from the Finnish-Norwegian Cultural Foundation. This study investigates survival and abundance of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Norway in 1988-2019 using capture-recapture models of photo-identification data. We merged two datasets collected in a restricted fjord system in 1988-2008 (Period 1) with a third, collected after their preferred herring prey shifted its wintering grounds to more exposed coastal waters in 2012-2019 (Period 2), and investigated any differences between these two periods. The resulting dataset, spanning 32 years, comprised 3284 captures of 1236 whales, including 148 individuals seen in both periods. The best-supported models of survival included the effects of sex and time period, and the presence of transients (whales seen only once). Period 2 had a much larger percentage of transients compared to Period 1 (mean = 30% vs. 5%) and the identification of two groups of whales with different residency patterns revealed heterogeneity in recapture probabilities. This caused estimates of survival rates to be biased downward (females: 0.955 ± 0.027 SE, males: 0.864 ± 0.038 SE) compared to Period 1 (females: 0.998 ± 0.002 SE, males: 0.985 ± 0.009 SE). Accounting for this heterogeneity resulted in estimates of apparent survival close to unity for regularly seen whales in Period 2. A robust design model for Period 2 further supported random temporary emigration at an estimated annual probability of 0.148 (± 0.095 SE). This same model estimated a peak in annual abundance in 2015 at 1061 individuals (95% CI 999-1127), compared to a maximum of 731 (95% CI 505-1059) previously estimated in Period 1, and dropped to 513 (95% CI 488-540) in 2018. Our results indicate variations in the proportion of killer whales present of an undefined population (or populations) in a larger geographical region. Killer whales have adjusted their distribution to shifts in key ...