Microphysics impacts on the warm conveyor belt and ridge building of the NAWDEX IOP6 cyclone
International audience This study investigates diabatic processes along the warm conveyor belt (WCB) of a deep extra-tropical cyclone observed of the North Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream Impact Experiment (NAWDEX). The aim is to investigate the effect of two different microphysics schemes, the on...
Published in: | Monthly Weather Review |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HAL CCSD
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://insu.hal.science/insu-03381560 https://insu.hal.science/insu-03381560v2/document https://insu.hal.science/insu-03381560v2/file/%255B15200493%2520-%2520Monthly%2520Weather%2520Review%255D%2520Microphysics%2520Impacts%2520on%2520the%2520Warm%2520Conveyor%2520Belt%2520and%2520Ridge%2520Building%2520of%2520the%2520NAWDEX%2520IOP6%2520Cyclone.pdf https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0061.1 |
Summary: | International audience This study investigates diabatic processes along the warm conveyor belt (WCB) of a deep extra-tropical cyclone observed of the North Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream Impact Experiment (NAWDEX). The aim is to investigate the effect of two different microphysics schemes, the one-moment scheme ICE3 and the quasi two-moment scheme LIMA, on the WCB and the ridge building downstream. ICE3 and LIMA also differ on the processes of vapor deposition on hydrometeors in cold and mixed-phase clouds. Latent heating in ICE3 is found to be dominated by deposition on ice while the heating in LIMA is distributed among depositions on ice, snow and graupel. ICE3 is the scheme leading to the largest number of WCB trajectories (30% more than LIMA) due to greater heating rates over larger areas. The consequence is that the size of the upper-level ridge is growing more rapidly in ICE3 than LIMA, albeit with some exceptions in localized regions of the cyclonic branch of the WCB. A comparison with various observations (airborne remote sensing measurements, dropsondes and satellite data) is then performed. Below the melting layer, the observed reflectivity is rather well reproduced by the model. Above the melting layer, in the middle of the troposphere, the reflectivity and retrieved ice water content are largely underestimated by both schemes while at upper levels, the ICE3 scheme performs much better than LIMA in agreement with a closer representation of the observed winds by ICE3. These results underline the strong sensitivity of upper-level dynamics to ice related processes. |
---|