Estimates and bootstrapped confidence intervals (N = 500 simulations) of fixed effects in minimal mixed models predicting approach behavior, reaction time and referencing behavior.
Domestic dogs were tested in a between-subject design in which each dog received one session where condition was Inequity and one session where condition was one of four controls. Domestic dog models predicted behavior as a function of Control Group (SNR, NSC1, NSC2, NSNR; baseline = NSC2) and Sessi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dataset |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t003 |
| id |
ftsmithonian:oai:figshare.com:article/16661740 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openpolar |
| spelling |
ftsmithonian:oai:figshare.com:article/16661740 2023-05-15T15:50:28+02:00 Estimates and bootstrapped confidence intervals (N = 500 simulations) of fixed effects in minimal mixed models predicting approach behavior, reaction time and referencing behavior. Katherine McAuliffe (491832) 2021-09-22T17:23:47Z https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t003 unknown https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Estimates_and_bootstrapped_confidence_intervals_N_500_simulations_of_fixed_effects_in_minimal_mixed_models_predicting_approach_behavior_reaction_time_and_referencing_behavior_/16661740 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t003 CC BY 4.0 CC-BY Evolutionary Biology Ecology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified unequal reward distributions study helps address past work suggests inequitable resource distributions div >< p distribution across taxa canis lupus </ canis familiaris </ many questions remain canis dingo </ subjects ’ refusal require specific training new experimental context investigating inequity aversion domestic dogs (< inequity aversion domestic dogs dingo (< raise questions new species inequity condition experimental features either dogs wolves (< social referencing providing data nonhuman species growing literature findings add domesticated canid control conditions comparative test closely related canid species call upon Dataset 2021 ftsmithonian https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t003 2021-12-20T01:43:38Z Domestic dogs were tested in a between-subject design in which each dog received one session where condition was Inequity and one session where condition was one of four controls. Domestic dog models predicted behavior as a function of Control Group (SNR, NSC1, NSC2, NSNR; baseline = NSC2) and Session Type (Control vs. Inequity; baseline = Control). Dingoes were tested in a within-subject design in which all subjects received all five conditions (Inequity, SNR, NSC1, NSC2, NSNR). Dingo models predicted behavior as a function of Condition. Table also shows goodness-of-fit statistics. Dataset Canis lupus Unknown |
| institution |
Open Polar |
| collection |
Unknown |
| op_collection_id |
ftsmithonian |
| language |
unknown |
| topic |
Evolutionary Biology Ecology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified unequal reward distributions study helps address past work suggests inequitable resource distributions div >< p distribution across taxa canis lupus </ canis familiaris </ many questions remain canis dingo </ subjects ’ refusal require specific training new experimental context investigating inequity aversion domestic dogs (< inequity aversion domestic dogs dingo (< raise questions new species inequity condition experimental features either dogs wolves (< social referencing providing data nonhuman species growing literature findings add domesticated canid control conditions comparative test closely related canid species call upon |
| spellingShingle |
Evolutionary Biology Ecology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified unequal reward distributions study helps address past work suggests inequitable resource distributions div >< p distribution across taxa canis lupus </ canis familiaris </ many questions remain canis dingo </ subjects ’ refusal require specific training new experimental context investigating inequity aversion domestic dogs (< inequity aversion domestic dogs dingo (< raise questions new species inequity condition experimental features either dogs wolves (< social referencing providing data nonhuman species growing literature findings add domesticated canid control conditions comparative test closely related canid species call upon Katherine McAuliffe (491832) Estimates and bootstrapped confidence intervals (N = 500 simulations) of fixed effects in minimal mixed models predicting approach behavior, reaction time and referencing behavior. |
| topic_facet |
Evolutionary Biology Ecology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified unequal reward distributions study helps address past work suggests inequitable resource distributions div >< p distribution across taxa canis lupus </ canis familiaris </ many questions remain canis dingo </ subjects ’ refusal require specific training new experimental context investigating inequity aversion domestic dogs (< inequity aversion domestic dogs dingo (< raise questions new species inequity condition experimental features either dogs wolves (< social referencing providing data nonhuman species growing literature findings add domesticated canid control conditions comparative test closely related canid species call upon |
| description |
Domestic dogs were tested in a between-subject design in which each dog received one session where condition was Inequity and one session where condition was one of four controls. Domestic dog models predicted behavior as a function of Control Group (SNR, NSC1, NSC2, NSNR; baseline = NSC2) and Session Type (Control vs. Inequity; baseline = Control). Dingoes were tested in a within-subject design in which all subjects received all five conditions (Inequity, SNR, NSC1, NSC2, NSNR). Dingo models predicted behavior as a function of Condition. Table also shows goodness-of-fit statistics. |
| format |
Dataset |
| author |
Katherine McAuliffe (491832) |
| author_facet |
Katherine McAuliffe (491832) |
| author_sort |
Katherine McAuliffe (491832) |
| title |
Estimates and bootstrapped confidence intervals (N = 500 simulations) of fixed effects in minimal mixed models predicting approach behavior, reaction time and referencing behavior. |
| title_short |
Estimates and bootstrapped confidence intervals (N = 500 simulations) of fixed effects in minimal mixed models predicting approach behavior, reaction time and referencing behavior. |
| title_full |
Estimates and bootstrapped confidence intervals (N = 500 simulations) of fixed effects in minimal mixed models predicting approach behavior, reaction time and referencing behavior. |
| title_fullStr |
Estimates and bootstrapped confidence intervals (N = 500 simulations) of fixed effects in minimal mixed models predicting approach behavior, reaction time and referencing behavior. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Estimates and bootstrapped confidence intervals (N = 500 simulations) of fixed effects in minimal mixed models predicting approach behavior, reaction time and referencing behavior. |
| title_sort |
estimates and bootstrapped confidence intervals (n = 500 simulations) of fixed effects in minimal mixed models predicting approach behavior, reaction time and referencing behavior. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t003 |
| genre |
Canis lupus |
| genre_facet |
Canis lupus |
| op_relation |
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Estimates_and_bootstrapped_confidence_intervals_N_500_simulations_of_fixed_effects_in_minimal_mixed_models_predicting_approach_behavior_reaction_time_and_referencing_behavior_/16661740 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t003 |
| op_rights |
CC BY 4.0 |
| op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY |
| op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t003 |
| _version_ |
1766385393214685184 |