Estimates and bootstrapped confidence intervals (N = 500 simulations) of fixed effects in minimal mixed models predicting approach behavior, reaction time and referencing behavior.

• Main Author: Katherine McAuliffe (491832)
• Format: Dataset
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2021
• Subjects: Evolutionary Biology; Ecology; Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified; unequal reward distributions; study helps address; past work suggests; inequitable resource distributions; div >< p; distribution across taxa; canis lupus </; canis familiaris </; many questions remain; canis dingo </; subjects ’ refusal; require specific training; new experimental context; investigating inequity aversion; domestic dogs (<; inequity aversion; domestic dogs; dingo (<; raise questions; new species; inequity condition; experimental features; either dogs; wolves (<; social referencing; providing data; nonhuman species; growing literature; findings add; domesticated canid; control conditions; comparative test; closely related; canid species; call upon; Canis lupus
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.t003

Domestic dogs were tested in a between-subject design in which each dog received one session where condition was Inequity and one session where condition was one of four controls. Domestic dog models predicted behavior as a function of Control Group (SNR, NSC1, NSC2, NSNR; baseline = NSC2) and Session Type (Control vs. Inequity; baseline = Control). Dingoes were tested in a within-subject design in which all subjects received all five conditions (Inequity, SNR, NSC1, NSC2, NSNR). Dingo models predicted behavior as a function of Condition. Table also shows goodness-of-fit statistics.