Testing set-up for dogs (A) and dingoes (B).
The subject’s handler and subject sat on the right of a transparent barrier and the partner and the partner’s handler sat on the left of the barrier. The experimenter stood in the middle of the testing space, called the subjects, and distributed rewards on plates. A subject was considered to have ap...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Still Image |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.g001 |
| id |
ftsmithonian:oai:figshare.com:article/16661725 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openpolar |
| spelling |
ftsmithonian:oai:figshare.com:article/16661725 2023-05-15T15:50:18+02:00 Testing set-up for dogs (A) and dingoes (B). Katherine McAuliffe (491832) 2021-09-22T17:23:47Z https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.g001 unknown https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Testing_set-up_for_dogs_A_and_dingoes_B_/16661725 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.g001 CC BY 4.0 CC-BY Evolutionary Biology Ecology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified unequal reward distributions study helps address past work suggests inequitable resource distributions div >< p distribution across taxa canis lupus </ canis familiaris </ many questions remain canis dingo </ subjects ’ refusal require specific training new experimental context investigating inequity aversion domestic dogs (< inequity aversion domestic dogs dingo (< raise questions new species inequity condition experimental features either dogs wolves (< social referencing providing data nonhuman species growing literature findings add domesticated canid control conditions comparative test closely related canid species call upon Image Figure 2021 ftsmithonian https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.g001 2021-12-20T01:43:38Z The subject’s handler and subject sat on the right of a transparent barrier and the partner and the partner’s handler sat on the left of the barrier. The experimenter stood in the middle of the testing space, called the subjects, and distributed rewards on plates. A subject was considered to have approached when he/she had two front paws in the box surrounding the plate (box marked by black tape for dogs and yellow cones and blue ribbon for dingoes). Still Image Canis lupus Unknown |
| institution |
Open Polar |
| collection |
Unknown |
| op_collection_id |
ftsmithonian |
| language |
unknown |
| topic |
Evolutionary Biology Ecology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified unequal reward distributions study helps address past work suggests inequitable resource distributions div >< p distribution across taxa canis lupus </ canis familiaris </ many questions remain canis dingo </ subjects ’ refusal require specific training new experimental context investigating inequity aversion domestic dogs (< inequity aversion domestic dogs dingo (< raise questions new species inequity condition experimental features either dogs wolves (< social referencing providing data nonhuman species growing literature findings add domesticated canid control conditions comparative test closely related canid species call upon |
| spellingShingle |
Evolutionary Biology Ecology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified unequal reward distributions study helps address past work suggests inequitable resource distributions div >< p distribution across taxa canis lupus </ canis familiaris </ many questions remain canis dingo </ subjects ’ refusal require specific training new experimental context investigating inequity aversion domestic dogs (< inequity aversion domestic dogs dingo (< raise questions new species inequity condition experimental features either dogs wolves (< social referencing providing data nonhuman species growing literature findings add domesticated canid control conditions comparative test closely related canid species call upon Katherine McAuliffe (491832) Testing set-up for dogs (A) and dingoes (B). |
| topic_facet |
Evolutionary Biology Ecology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified unequal reward distributions study helps address past work suggests inequitable resource distributions div >< p distribution across taxa canis lupus </ canis familiaris </ many questions remain canis dingo </ subjects ’ refusal require specific training new experimental context investigating inequity aversion domestic dogs (< inequity aversion domestic dogs dingo (< raise questions new species inequity condition experimental features either dogs wolves (< social referencing providing data nonhuman species growing literature findings add domesticated canid control conditions comparative test closely related canid species call upon |
| description |
The subject’s handler and subject sat on the right of a transparent barrier and the partner and the partner’s handler sat on the left of the barrier. The experimenter stood in the middle of the testing space, called the subjects, and distributed rewards on plates. A subject was considered to have approached when he/she had two front paws in the box surrounding the plate (box marked by black tape for dogs and yellow cones and blue ribbon for dingoes). |
| format |
Still Image |
| author |
Katherine McAuliffe (491832) |
| author_facet |
Katherine McAuliffe (491832) |
| author_sort |
Katherine McAuliffe (491832) |
| title |
Testing set-up for dogs (A) and dingoes (B). |
| title_short |
Testing set-up for dogs (A) and dingoes (B). |
| title_full |
Testing set-up for dogs (A) and dingoes (B). |
| title_fullStr |
Testing set-up for dogs (A) and dingoes (B). |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Testing set-up for dogs (A) and dingoes (B). |
| title_sort |
testing set-up for dogs (a) and dingoes (b). |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.g001 |
| genre |
Canis lupus |
| genre_facet |
Canis lupus |
| op_relation |
https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Testing_set-up_for_dogs_A_and_dingoes_B_/16661725 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.g001 |
| op_rights |
CC BY 4.0 |
| op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY |
| op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.g001 |
| _version_ |
1766385268709916672 |