Testing set-up for dogs (A) and dingoes (B).

• Main Author: Katherine McAuliffe (491832)
• Format: Still Image
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2021
• Subjects: Evolutionary Biology; Ecology; Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified; unequal reward distributions; study helps address; past work suggests; inequitable resource distributions; div >< p; distribution across taxa; canis lupus </; canis familiaris </; many questions remain; canis dingo </; subjects ’ refusal; require specific training; new experimental context; investigating inequity aversion; domestic dogs (<; inequity aversion; domestic dogs; dingo (<; raise questions; new species; inequity condition; experimental features; either dogs; wolves (<; social referencing; providing data; nonhuman species; growing literature; findings add; domesticated canid; control conditions; comparative test; closely related; canid species; call upon; Canis lupus
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885.g001

The subject’s handler and subject sat on the right of a transparent barrier and the partner and the partner’s handler sat on the left of the barrier. The experimenter stood in the middle of the testing space, called the subjects, and distributed rewards on plates. A subject was considered to have approached when he/she had two front paws in the box surrounding the plate (box marked by black tape for dogs and yellow cones and blue ribbon for dingoes).