Predictive power of the morphotype test in different contact zones.

(A) Dependence of proportion of M . trossulus ( Ptros ) on proportion of T-morphotypes ( PT ). Dotted lines are empirical regressions (Model 4). Solid gray lines–predictions of “ Ptros by PT calculator” ( Eq 3 ). Solid black lines represent Y = X dependence. (B) Probability to find a mussel with a T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vadim Khaitov (2589874), Julia Marchenko (11177903), Marina Katolikova (2589880), Risto Väinölä (2589886), Sarah E. Kingston (3608393), David B. Carlon (11177906), Michael Gantsevich (2589877), Petr Strelkov (2589883)
Format: Still Image
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249587.g004
Description
Summary:(A) Dependence of proportion of M . trossulus ( Ptros ) on proportion of T-morphotypes ( PT ). Dotted lines are empirical regressions (Model 4). Solid gray lines–predictions of “ Ptros by PT calculator” ( Eq 3 ). Solid black lines represent Y = X dependence. (B) Probability to find a mussel with a T-morphotype among M . edulis ( P(T|edu) ) (empty points), and M . trossulus ( P(T|tros) ) (filled points) as a function of Ptros . Lines are empirical regressions (Model 5). (C) Probability of correct species identification by the morphotype test: M . trossulus by T-morphotype, P(tros|T) (filled points) and M . edulis by E-morphotype, P(edu|E) (empty points) as a function of Ptros . Dotted lines are empirical regressions (Model 6). Sold lines–predictions of “genotype by morphotype calculator” for M . trossulus ( Eq 1 , red line) and M . edulis ( Eq 2 , blue line). On each graph, dots represent the observed proportions in samples, and shaded areas around regression lines– 95% CI of regressions.