Supplemental data and figures from Diversified local CRISPR–Cas immunity to viruses of Sulfolobus islandicus

The population diversity and structure of CRISPR–Cas immunity provides key insights into virus–host interactions. Here, we examine two geographically and genetically distinct natural populations of the thermophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus islandicus and their interactions with Sulfolobus spindle-sha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew D. Pauly, Maria A. Bautista, Jesse A. Black, Rachel J. Whitaker
Format: Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Microbiology
Evolutionary Biology
CRISPR immunity
population diversity
microbial evolution
host–virus interactions
Kamchatka
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7701047.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Supplemental_data_and_figures_from_Diversified_local_CRISPR_Cas_immunity_to_viruses_of_i_Sulfolobus_islandicus_i_/7701047
Description
Summary:The population diversity and structure of CRISPR–Cas immunity provides key insights into virus–host interactions. Here, we examine two geographically and genetically distinct natural populations of the thermophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus islandicus and their interactions with Sulfolobus spindle-shaped viruses (SSVs) and S. islandicus rod-shaped viruses (SIRVs). We found that both virus families can be targeted with high population distributed immunity, whereby most immune strains target a virus using unique unshared CRISPR spacers. In Kamchatka, Russia, we observed high immunity to chronic SSVs that increases over time. In this context, we found that some SSVs had shortened genomes lacking genes that are highly targeted by the S. islandicus population, indicating a potential mechanism of immune evasion. By contrast, in Yellowstone National Park, we find high inter- and intra-strain immune diversity targeting lytic SIRVs and low immunity to chronic SSVs. In this population, we observed evidence of SIRVs evolving immunity through mutations concentrated in the first five bases of protospacers. These results indicate that diversity and structure of antiviral CRISPR–Cas immunity for a single microbial species can differ by both the population and virus type, and suggest that different virus families use different mechanisms to evade CRISPR–Cas immunity.This article is part of the theme issue ‘The ecology and evolution of prokaryotic CRISPR–Cas adaptive immune systems’.

Similar Items