S1;S2 from Harvest and group effects on pup survival in a cooperative breeder

S1. Details of sample of wolves harvested in Idaho USA, 2009-2014. Month animal was harvested is listed in parentheses. BF = breeding female, BM = breeding male, NBF = nonbreeding female, NBM = nonbreeding male. Not all harvested wolves had viable DNA samples or complete information taken during man...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David E. Ausband, Michael S. Mitchell, Carisa R. Stansbury, Jennifer L. Stenglein, Lisette P. Waits
Format: Other Non-Article Part of Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Ecology
cooperative breeding
Canis lupus
grey wolves
helping
mortality
survival
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4982594.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/S1_S2_from_Harvest_and_group_effects_on_pup_survival_in_a_cooperative_breeder/4982594
Description
Summary:S1. Details of sample of wolves harvested in Idaho USA, 2009-2014. Month animal was harvested is listed in parentheses. BF = breeding female, BM = breeding male, NBF = nonbreeding female, NBM = nonbreeding male. Not all harvested wolves had viable DNA samples or complete information taken during mandatory hunter check-in. This table does not represent the total harvest for the study areas in this paper.;S2. Data used for analysis of pup survival, Alberta, Idaho and Yellowstone National Park, Ausband et al.

Similar Items