Supplemental Figure S2. Estimates of amplification bias in common prey species from Spatial and seasonal foraging patterns drive diet differences among North Pacific resident killer whale populations
Supplemental Figure S2. Left: Estimates of amplification bias in 10 species included in this study’s mock mixtures, estimated according to Shelton et al. 2022, and used to correct the proportional abundance of these species in the diet samples included in this study. Right: Two mock mixture contro...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Still Image |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26978479.v2 https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Supplementary_Material_from_Spatial_and_seasonal_foraging_patterns_drive_diet_differences_among_North_Pacific_resident_killer_whale_populations/26978479 |
Summary: | Supplemental Figure S2. Left: Estimates of amplification bias in 10 species included in this study’s mock mixtures, estimated according to Shelton et al. 2022, and used to correct the proportional abundance of these species in the diet samples included in this study. Right: Two mock mixture control samples sequenced across five MiSeq runs included in the study show the difference between the expected and observed proportion of reads assigned to each species. Black line is 1:1. |
---|