Monitoring does not always count

The gross under-resourcing of conservation endeavours has placed an increasing emphasis on spending accountability. Increased accountability has led to monitoring forming a central element of conservation programs. Although there is little doubt that information obtained from monitoring can improve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Main Authors: Mcdonald-Madden, Eve, Baxter, Peter, Fuller, Richard, Martin, Tara, Game, Edward, Montambault, Jensen, Possingham, Hugh
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Elsevier Ltd. 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.qut.edu.au/217992/
Description
Summary:The gross under-resourcing of conservation endeavours has placed an increasing emphasis on spending accountability. Increased accountability has led to monitoring forming a central element of conservation programs. Although there is little doubt that information obtained from monitoring can improve management of biodiversity, the cost (in time and/or money) of gaining this knowledge is rarely considered when making decisions about allocation of resources to monitoring. We present a simple framework allowing managers and policy advisors to make decisions about when to invest in monitoring to improve management. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.