Ganging up or sticking together? Group processes and children's responses to text‐message bullying

Item originally deposited in Cardiff University, ORCA repository at: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/30965 Item not available in this repository Sian Jones - orcid:0000-0002-2399-1017 orcid:0000-0002-2399-1017 Drawing on social identity theory and intergroup emotion theory (IET), we examined group pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jones, Sian, Manstead, Antony S. R., Livingstone, Andrew G.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/9193
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12289/9193
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1348/000712610X502826
Description
Summary:Item originally deposited in Cardiff University, ORCA repository at: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/id/eprint/30965 Item not available in this repository Sian Jones - orcid:0000-0002-2399-1017 orcid:0000-0002-2399-1017 Drawing on social identity theory and intergroup emotion theory (IET), we examined group processes underlying bullying behaviour. Children were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a perpetrator's group, a target's group, or a third party group. They then read a gender‐consistent scenario in which the norm of the perpetrator's group (to be kind or unkind towards others) was manipulated, and an instance of cyberbullying between the perpetrator's group and a member of the target's group was described. It was found that group membership, group norms, and the proposed antecedents of the group‐based emotions of pride, shame, and anger (but not guilt) influenced group‐based emotions and action tendencies in ways predicted by social identity and IET. The results underline the importance of understanding group‐level emotional reactions when it comes to tackling bullying, and show that being part of a group can be helpful in overcoming the negative effects of bullying. The first author gratefully acknowledges support from the Economic and Social Research Council (Award Number: PTA‐031‐2006‐00548). The third author would like to thank the Leverhulme Trust (ECF/2007/0050) for their support. 102 pub pub 1