Fig 5 -

The relationship between (a) breeding success (binary part; estimate -0.11 ± 0.15 SE, χ 2 (n = 399) = 0.55, P = 0.456); and, (b) fledged brood size (1–4 young, truncated part; estimate -0.19 ± 0.05 SE, χ 2 (n = 316) = 13.70, P < 0.001) and the timing of breeding, based on predicted values of Hurd...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petra Sumasgutner (2926185), Andrew Jenkins (2600980), Arjun Amar (503756), Res Altwegg (408673)
Format: Still Image
Language:unknown
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Neuroscience
Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Science Policy
Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
urbanisation
performance
timing
weather conditions
weather events
nest boxes
peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus
nest boxes buffer
anthropogenic climate change
Falco peregrinus
peregrine falcon
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234503.g005
Description
Summary:The relationship between (a) breeding success (binary part; estimate -0.11 ± 0.15 SE, χ 2 (n = 399) = 0.55, P = 0.456); and, (b) fledged brood size (1–4 young, truncated part; estimate -0.19 ± 0.05 SE, χ 2 (n = 316) = 13.70, P < 0.001) and the timing of breeding, based on predicted values of Hurdle model on the full data set, 95% CIs in shaded grey. Model details in Table 4 .

Similar Items