Targeted Use of Sustainable Aviation Fuel to Maximize Climate Benefits

• Published in: Environmental Science & Technology
• Main Authors: Teoh, Roger, Schumann, Ulrich, Voigt, Christiane, Schripp, Tobias, Shapiro, Marc, Engberg, Zebediah, Molloy, Jarlath, Koudis, George, Stettler, Marc E. J.
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: American Chemical Society 2022
• Subjects: North Atlantic
• Online Access: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730838/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394538; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05781

[Image: see text] Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) can reduce aviation’s CO(2) and non-CO(2) impacts. We quantify the change in contrail properties and climate forcing in the North Atlantic resulting from different blending ratios of SAF and demonstrate that intelligently allocating the limited SAF supply could multiply its overall climate benefit by factors of 9–15. A fleetwide adoption of 100% SAF increases contrail occurrence (+5%), but lower nonvolatile particle emissions (−52%) reduce the annual mean contrail net radiative forcing (−44%), adding to climate gains from reduced life cycle CO(2) emissions. However, in the short term, SAF supply will be constrained. SAF blended at a 1% ratio and uniformly distributed to all transatlantic flights would reduce both the annual contrail energy forcing (EF(contrail)) and the total energy forcing (EF(total), contrails + change in CO(2) life cycle emissions) by ∼0.6%. Instead, targeting the same quantity of SAF at a 50% blend ratio to ∼2% of flights responsible for the most highly warming contrails reduces EF(contrail) and EF(total) by ∼10 and ∼6%, respectively. Acknowledging forecasting uncertainties, SAF blended at lower ratios (10%) and distributed to more flights (∼9%) still reduces EF(contrail) (∼5%) and EF(total) (∼3%). Both strategies deploy SAF on flights with engine particle emissions exceeding 10(12) m(–1), at night-time, and in winter.