Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies

This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and mi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS Biology
Main Author: Munday, Philip L.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2022
Subjects:
Formal Comment
Ocean acidification
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:9681065
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:9681065 2023-05-15T17:50:05+02:00 Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies Munday, Philip L. 2022-11-22 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/ https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809 en eng Public Library of Science http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809 © 2022 Philip L. Munday https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. CC-BY PLoS Biol Formal Comment Text 2022 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809 2022-11-27T01:53:03Z This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and missing studies with strong effects. Text Ocean acidification PubMed Central (PMC) PLOS Biology 20 11 e3001809
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Formal Comment
spellingShingle Formal Comment
Munday, Philip L.
Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
topic_facet Formal Comment
description This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and missing studies with strong effects.
format Text
author Munday, Philip L.
author_facet Munday, Philip L.
author_sort Munday, Philip L.
title Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_short Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_full Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_fullStr Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_full_unstemmed Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_sort reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2022
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_source PLoS Biol
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809
op_rights © 2022 Philip L. Munday
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809
container_title PLOS Biology
container_volume 20
container_issue 11
container_start_page e3001809
_version_ 1766156680221949952

Similar Items