Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and mi...
| Published in: | PLOS Biology |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/ https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809 |
| Summary: | This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and missing studies with strong effects. |
|---|