Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and mi...
Published in: | PLOS Biology |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/ https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001809 |
Summary: | This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and missing studies with strong effects. |
---|